Critics contend that a division between humanitarian and developmental goals has led to unnecessary competition between these policy areas to the detriment of the very people in need of assistance. This article argues that the humanitarian–development divide is inappropriate given the nature of contemporary conflicts. It explores ways in which we can move beyond it.
In this thoughtful article, Paul Hopper looks at both humanitarian and development goals, and at the potential and sometimes real conflict between them. He points to the extent of armed conflict around the globe, showing how the complex emergencies that arise from such conflicts are putting an increasing strain on aid finances. He discusses the interesting suggestion that perhaps there is now a need for a global fund to deal with both short- and longerterm aid issues, together with a need for more diverse sources of funding. Emphasis is also placed on the need to recognise the local context of many problems, so that more specific solutions can be explored. This article is of particular relevance to the topic of ‘Development’, but given the political sensitivity of foreign aid budgets, also raises issues of social policy.
Your organisation does not have access to this article.
Sign up today to give your students the edge they need to achieve their best grades with subject expertise
Subscribe
