Skip to main content

This link is exclusively for students and staff members within this organisation.

Unauthorised use will lead to account termination.

Next

Ethics: moving on from Milgram?

This is not about obedience

Reappraising Milgram’s Yale studies

Alex Haslam and Stephen Reicher revisit these classic studies and examine present-day obedience research.

Anyka /Fotolia

What do Milgram’s so-called ‘obedience studies’ tell us? When we ask that of people, we nearly always get the same answer: ‘They show that people will automatically obey orders from an authority figure, no matter how extreme.’ Were you about to say something similar? If so you, like most people, would have been wrong. Seriously wrong. So let us go back and look at what actually happened in those studies in New Haven Connecticut just over 50 years ago.

A man sits in front of a huge, imposing machine covered in an array of switches. He thinks his task is to act as ‘teacher’ in a memory study. Each time the learner makes an error, he has to administer an electric shock by depressing one of the switches. The level of shock rises relentlessly all the way to 450 volts.

Your organisation does not have access to this article.

Sign up today to give your students the edge they need to achieve their best grades with subject expertise

Subscribe

Next

Ethics: moving on from Milgram?

Related articles: