Skip to main content

This link is exclusively for students and staff members within this organisation.

Unauthorised use will lead to account termination.

Previous

Peering into the future of peer review: a curious case from parapsychology

Next

Rosenhan’s ‘On being sane in insane places’

student activities

Peering into the future of peer review

Consolidate your learning with activities that enhance the article you have just read. Chris French asks the questions

Bargh’s experiment involved ‘priming’ participants with words associated with old age (including old, wrinkle and bingo). His results found that primed people then walked more slowly along a corridor when leaving the experiment room
Sylvie Bouchard/Fotolia

It is important to understand how science works if you are to fully appreciate the strengths and weaknesses of the scientific method. The reason why science is such an effective means of approaching true understanding of the universe around us and our place in it is because scientific theories are always open to revision in the light of new evidence.

Science is therefore self-correcting, and no theory or hypothesis should ever be even tentatively accepted without being subjected to proper critical evaluation. Peer review is the primary means for achieving such evaluation but, as my article shows, the current system does not always work perfectly.

Your organisation does not have access to this article.

Sign up today to give your students the edge they need to achieve their best grades with subject expertise

Subscribe

Previous

Peering into the future of peer review: a curious case from parapsychology

Next

Rosenhan’s ‘On being sane in insane places’

Related articles: