Skip to main content

This link is exclusively for students and staff members within this organisation.

Unauthorised use will lead to account termination.

Previous

This is not about obedience: reappraising Milgram’s Yale studies

Next

Classification and diagnosis of mental disorders: the proposed DSM-5

issues, debates and approaches

Ethics

Moving on from Milgram?

Following on from the article by Haslam and Reicher, Paul Humphreys focuses on the ethics debate sparked by Milgram

Nobilior/Fotolia

In the minds of most A-level psychology students, the words ‘ethics’ and ‘Milgram’ appear to be inextricably linked.

The first set of APA (American Psychological Association) ethical guidelines pre-dated Milgram’s first studies of obedience by 3 years (APA ethics 1958, Milgram’s studies 1961). See also ‘Student activities: Psychologists, ethics and Guantanamo Bay’, PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, Vol. 16, No. 3. However, such was the furore that followed the publication of the obedience studies that life in psychological research would never be the same again.

Your organisation does not have access to this article.

Sign up today to give your students the edge they need to achieve their best grades with subject expertise

Subscribe

Previous

This is not about obedience: reappraising Milgram’s Yale studies

Next

Classification and diagnosis of mental disorders: the proposed DSM-5

Related articles: