Skip to main content

This link is exclusively for students and staff members within this organisation.

Unauthorised use will lead to account termination.

Previous

Cognitive behavioural approaches

Next

Eyewitness testimony

Eyewitness testimony

Many miscarriages of justice occur because evidence from eyewitnesses can be unreliable. However, such evidence is often all that is available to the justice system. Michael Eysenck considers the strengths and limitations of eyewitness testimony.

Most people’s bank-robbery schema involves something like this image
Fotolia

There have always been strong suspicions that innocent individuals were being convicted and sent to prison on the basis of misremembered information from eyewitnesses. Nowadays, DNA tests can often establish whether the individual found guilty was actually responsible. In the USA, such tests have shown that over 200 convicted people were actually innocent. Mistaken eyewitness identification was responsible in over three-quarters of cases.

Why are eyewitnesses so prone to making mistakes when providing information about a crime they have observed? One explanation is that most crimes occur suddenly and unexpectedly, and so eyewitnesses often fail to attend fully to events. Insufficient attention is undoubtedly an important factor. However, as we are about to see, what happens after the crime is also important.

Your organisation does not have access to this article.

Sign up today to give your students the edge they need to achieve their best grades with subject expertise

Subscribe

Previous

Cognitive behavioural approaches

Next

Eyewitness testimony

Related articles: