Skip to main content

This link is exclusively for students and staff members within this organisation.

Unauthorised use will lead to account termination.

Previous

Ecologism: does it imply a deterioration in living standards?

highlights

First-past-the-post

Not fit for purpose?

‘The present system has clearly broken down. The results produced are not fair… In many cases they do not secure majority representation, nor do they secure an intelligent representation of minorities.’ This was Winston Churchill, writing about first-past-the-post (FPTP) in 1909, but his words are still relevant today.

Not everyone agrees: defenders of FPTP praise its ability to produce strong majority governments that can be held accountable by the electorate. They cite FPTP’s simplicity, and the strong MP-constituency link, as reasons to preserve it. Some praise the way in which the requirement to win a plurality of votes has kept extremist political parties excluded from British politics. However, the 2010 and 2015 general elections highlighted the problems of FPTP, leading to louder calls for a change of voting system.

Your organisation does not have access to this article.

Sign up today to give your students the edge they need to achieve their best grades with subject expertise

Subscribe

Previous

Ecologism: does it imply a deterioration in living standards?

Related articles: