Skip to main content

This link is exclusively for students and staff members within this organisation.

Unauthorised use will lead to account termination.

Previous

AQA Government and Politics: effective use of examples in A2 US politics: the 3Rs approach

Next

What next for the Union?: the constitutional implications of the Scottish referendum

debate

Is the process for nominating presidential candidates hopelessly flawed?

Neil Whiskerd and Anthony J. Bennett debate the question

Barack Obama on the campaign trail in Oregon in 2008 at a rally attended by over 80,000 people

The current arrangements for nominating presidential candidates are now so fatally flawed that they are ready for reform. According to one commentator, the existing presidential nomination process has not produced candidates with mass appeal and has proven time-consuming and often prohibitively expensive. Equally, the prospect of imposing unwanted nominees on ill-informed voters and reluctant party leaders tends to reduce its appeal further. To most party officials the primary election process represents an open invitation to fratricidal conflict. Here are seven reasons why the whole process is so hopelessly flawed.

(1) Too long

Your organisation does not have access to this article.

Sign up today to give your students the edge they need to achieve their best grades with subject expertise

Subscribe

Previous

AQA Government and Politics: effective use of examples in A2 US politics: the 3Rs approach

Next

What next for the Union?: the constitutional implications of the Scottish referendum

Related articles: