Skip to main content

This link is exclusively for students and staff members within this organisation.

Unauthorised use will lead to account termination.

Previous

Politics at Glasgow University: a student’s perspective

Next

Feminism: are all feminists radical?

debate

Should the UK have a codified constitution?

Paul Jeater and Ian Richards debate the issue

The power of judicial review is limited in the UK, as judges do not have the power to strike down legislation
Dimitar Marinov/Fotolia

Labour’s constitutional reforms between 1997 and 2010 brought about a greater codification of the British constitution. The Conservative–Lib Dem coalition elected in 2010 introduced further constitutional reforms. There is a strong case for arguing that the logical outcome of such major constitutional changes is that the UK should have a codified constitution to enshrine the changes. Here are some key arguments in favour of a codified constitution.

A codified constitution is one that is enshrined in a single document. This gives it the obvious advantage that it is clear and accessible to all citizens — they can easily refer to and identify with it. When political disputes occur a codified constitution reduces the possibility of ambiguity that exists with the many conventions that currently make up our political system.

Your organisation does not have access to this article.

Sign up today to give your students the edge they need to achieve their best grades with subject expertise

Subscribe

Previous

Politics at Glasgow University: a student’s perspective

Next

Feminism: are all feminists radical?

Related articles: