Skip to main content

This link is exclusively for students and staff members within this organisation.

Unauthorised use will lead to account termination.

Previous

Departmental select committees

Next

The House of Lords: why is it so difficult to reform?

debate

Does the US Supreme Court have too much power?

Kaylan Billingsley and Anthony J. Bennett debate the question

The Supreme Court justices of the USA, October 2010
Rex Features

Charles Evans Hughes, the 11thchief justice of the Supreme Court once said, ‘We are under a Constitution, but the Constitution is what the judges say it is.’ Since Marbury v Madison (1803) established the doctrine of judicial review, the Supreme Court has essentially been able to shape the parameters of the Constitution to bring about dramatic social and legal change in the USA. There is no denying that the court has a lot of influence, but has the evolution of the Supreme Court’s judicial role given it too much power in the USA? The answer to that is clearly yes, for three significant reasons.

First, the most important thing to consider when examining the scope of the Supreme Court’s power is its power of judicial review. In the case of Marbury v Madison, Chief Justice John Marshall established the power of the court to declare acts of Congress, actions of the president or any member of the federal executive, as well as legislation and actions of the state governments, unconstitutional.

Your organisation does not have access to this article.

Sign up today to give your students the edge they need to achieve their best grades with subject expertise

Subscribe

Previous

Departmental select committees

Next

The House of Lords: why is it so difficult to reform?

Related articles: