Skip to main content

This link is exclusively for students and staff members within this organisation.

Unauthorised use will lead to account termination.

Previous

Ecologism: how ‘deep’ is deep ecology?

Next

Why does the House of Lords matter?

DEBATE

Should the Electoral College be abolished?

Anthony Bennett and Colleen Harris debate the question.

Table 1 Rogue electors, 1972–2004

YES

● You can make out a pretty strong case as to why the Electoral College should be abolished by considering two people from the 2000 election — George W. Bush and Barbara Lett-Simmons. Let’s start with the well-known name. As everyone knows, the 2000 presidential election was won by Al Gore — that is, Gore got more votes than any other candidate and surely, therefore, ‘won’ the election. Democrat Al Gore polled just over 51 million votes while his Republican opponent, Governor George W. Bush, polled only 50.4 million votes. But, as a result of the vagaries of the Electoral College system, Governor Bush became president because he won more Electoral College votes than Gore: 271 to 267. The popular vote loser won. This was not the first time this had happened.

Your organisation does not have access to this article.

Sign up today to give your students the edge they need to achieve their best grades with subject expertise

Subscribe

Previous

Ecologism: how ‘deep’ is deep ecology?

Next

Why does the House of Lords matter?

Related articles: