Skip to main content

This link is exclusively for students and staff members within this organisation.

Unauthorised use will lead to account termination.

Previous

Dani Rodrik

Next

Growth and deevelopment in the Harrod-Domar model

fiscal policy

The national living wage

Does it help or hurt the low-paid?

In this column, Joel Becker explores some of the reasons why George Osborne’s proposed national living wage has received mixed reactions from economists, and looks at the differences between ‘low-wage’ and ‘low-income’ families

In 1999 the Labour government introduced a national minimum wage (NMW) with the objective of reducing poverty. In 2015, George Osborne’s final Budget as chancellor replaced this with a national living wage (NLW), which aimed to ‘give Britain a pay rise’ in an era of austerity. While these policies have been broadly welcomed, particularly by those who have seen their incomes stagnate in recent years, they have received mixed reactions from economists.

A minimum wage is, in effect, a price floor for the labour market. We typically think of firms demanding a given quantity of labour and workers supplying a given quantity of labour at each price. Figure 1 depicts this relationship, and the unambiguous effect that introducing a minimum wage has on employment.

Your organisation does not have access to this article.

Sign up today to give your students the edge they need to achieve their best grades with subject expertise

Subscribe

Previous

Dani Rodrik

Next

Growth and deevelopment in the Harrod-Domar model

Related articles: