Skip to main content

This link is exclusively for students and staff members within this organisation.

Unauthorised use will lead to account termination.

Previous

Jurors, new technology and contempt of court

Next

Liability under the Animals Act 1971

examination focus

Improving your answers

Nicholas Price suggests ways to improve your exam answers on lawmaking topics

Fotolia

Examiners frequently comment in their reports that answers need to have supporting examples or legal authority. The reason for this is that examiners need to be shown that students have a real understanding of the topic. This will lead to higher-level marks being awarded.

Take, for example, a question that asks the candidate to describe the ratio decidendi in judicial precedent. An answer that reads, ‘The ratio decidendi of a case is the judge’s reason for the decision given at the end of the case’ is accurate but is likely to receive lower level marks, as there is limited detail included.

Your organisation does not have access to this article.

Sign up today to give your students the edge they need to achieve their best grades with subject expertise

Subscribe

Previous

Jurors, new technology and contempt of court

Next

Liability under the Animals Act 1971

Related articles: