Skip to main content

This link is exclusively for students and staff members within this organisation.

Unauthorised use will lead to account termination.

Previous

Answering shorter substantive law questions in AQA exams

Next

Theory of contract law: offer and acceptance

law updates

Craig Beauman keeps you up to date with the latest developments in topics across the A-level law specifications

McNutt v Transport for London (2019)

Here, the defendant taxi driver had been charged with an offence contrary to section 165(7) of the Equality Act 2010 — part of the Act that specifically applies to taxi drivers and their passengers in wheelchairs. Under section 165(4)(b) of the Act, a duty is imposed on a driver of a taxi ‘to not make any additional charge’ due to the fact that a passenger is in a wheelchair. The defendant had been convicted of the offence at the Magistrates’ Court and had appealed by way of case stated to the Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court.

Your organisation does not have access to this article.

Sign up today to give your students the edge they need to achieve their best grades with subject expertise

Subscribe

Previous

Answering shorter substantive law questions in AQA exams

Next

Theory of contract law: offer and acceptance

Related articles: