Skip to main content

This link is exclusively for students and staff members within this organisation.

Unauthorised use will lead to account termination.

Previous

Tort causation cases

Next

Tackling scenario questions

law updates

Craig Beauman keeps you up to date with the latest developments in topics across the A-level specifications

In this case, the Court of Appeal confirmed the common law defence of self-defence codified in s.76 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 and its position in relation to voluntary intoxication. The defendant had attacked the victim with a metal tyre lever, convinced that he was a terrorist. The victim was in fact an electrician whose van had broken down. The defendant had stopped on a Sunday afternoon to help, but seeing lengths of wire and electrical devices in the van had formed the opinion he had stumbled upon a terrorist plot. This was later discovered not to be the case as the victim had indeed simply broken down.

Against a charge of attempted murder, the defendant pleaded selfdefence. At the trial the prosecution argued the defendant was suffering a drug-infused psychosis and from a drug or alcohol-induced psychotic disorder at the time of the offence. He admitted that he had abused drugs and alcohol from an early age and had been heavily drinking the 2 days before and knew this could lead to paranoia.

Your organisation does not have access to this article.

Sign up today to give your students the edge they need to achieve their best grades with subject expertise

Subscribe

Previous

Tort causation cases

Next

Tackling scenario questions

Related articles: