Skip to main content

This link is exclusively for students and staff members within this organisation.

Unauthorised use will lead to account termination.

Previous

Duty of care: the three-part test

Next

Recent cases on contract

law updates

Craig Beauman keeps you informed of the latest developments in topics across the A-level specifications

In this case an employment tribunal had to decide whether the claimant taxi drivers were ‘employees’ of the defendants or self-employed. If they were deemed as ‘employees’, then they would be covered by the national minimum wage regulations and be entitled to such expected benefits as holiday pay, neither of which they received. The defendants had maintained that the drivers were self-employed and not entitled to such benefits. In consideration, the tribunal applied each of the tests of employment, for example, control and mutuality of obligation, while looking inter alia at the following facts:

■ Uber gives drivers the first name of passengers, but not their surname.

Your organisation does not have access to this article.

Sign up today to give your students the edge they need to achieve their best grades with subject expertise

Subscribe

Previous

Duty of care: the three-part test

Next

Recent cases on contract

Related articles: