Skip to main content

This link is exclusively for students and staff members within this organisation.

Unauthorised use will lead to account termination.

Previous

Frustration

Next

Legal system under pressure

landmarks in the common law

Analysing fault within R v Jogee (2016)

The Supreme Court (formerly the House of Lords Appellate Committee) is reluctant to overturn previous decisions in criminal cases, preferring that any such amendments to the law are made by Parliament. Ian Yule highlights a rare example of the 1966 Practice Direction in use

In R v Jogee (2016), the Supreme Court expressly overruled the decision in R v Powell and English (1997), which had upheld the Privy Council decision in Chan Wing-Siu v R (1984). In Jogee, the Supreme Court ruled that the court in Chan Wing-Siu had ‘taken a wrong turn’.

The more relevant issue for A-level law is that of fault-based liability, which was analysed in Jogee. The case concerns the law on joint enterprise: when a number of people take part in a common criminal offence. This could be the result of a prior agreement by the participants to commit the offence or ‘the result of a sudden or spontaneous shared common intention’ (Loveless, J. Complete Criminal Law, 2008, p. 208).

Your organisation does not have access to this article.

Sign up today to give your students the edge they need to achieve their best grades with subject expertise

Subscribe

Previous

Frustration

Next

Legal system under pressure

Related articles: