Skip to main content

This link is exclusively for students and staff members within this organisation.

Unauthorised use will lead to account termination.

Previous

Killing in your sleep?: the challenges of automatism

Next

Oye (2013): insanity and self-defence

examination focus

Intoxication

Craig Beauman provides in-depth analysis of the topic for the 2015 OCR G154 Criminal Law Special Study

Intoxication does not allow for the excuse that ‘I was so drunk I don’t remember what I did’

This ‘Examination focus’ is relevant for OCR A2 Unit G153 and G154 (summer 2015) and AQA A2 Unit 4 LAW03 and WJEC A2 Unit 3 and Unit 4.

One of the most controversial areas of the criminal law is its response to defendants who commit crimes and try to excuse themselves from liability due to being intoxicated by alcohol, drugs or other intoxicants. Surely the law must take a dim view of a defendant who, while deliberately intoxicated, commits a crime? However, if while intoxicated, defendants cannot remember any of their actions, how can it be proved that they knew, or were aware of, their actions? Would it be impossible for the prosecution to prove the defendant’s mens rea — usually his or her intention?

Your organisation does not have access to this article.

Sign up today to give your students the edge they need to achieve their best grades with subject expertise

Subscribe

Previous

Killing in your sleep?: the challenges of automatism

Next

Oye (2013): insanity and self-defence

Related articles: